The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (referred to as the "ARRA", "Recovery Act" or "Stimulus Bill") was signed into law in February 2009 and was intended to stimulate the U.S. economy by injecting $787 billion in spending and tax cuts. Of this, approximately $89.4 billion1 was designated for education training, aid and employment services, $32.7 billion to transportation projects, $25.0 billion for infrastructure projects, $22.4 for energy and $12.3 for housing.
The ARRA includes a Buy American provision, Section 1605 that mirrors the previously existing 1933 Buy American and 1982 Buy America Acts. This means that for federal, state and municipal projects funded by the ARRA, there is a preference for the use of U.S. domestic products. It is important to note that the version of Buy American rules found in the ARRA only applies to Recovery funded projects and will cease to apply when the lifespan of this act is complete.
Section 1605 of the Recovery Act specifies that for any ARRA funded project requiring the construction, alteration, maintenance or repair of a public building or public work, 100% of the iron, steel and manufactured goods used in the project must be produced in the U.S.
Section 1605 also stipulates that the Buy American provisions must be applied in a manner consistent with U.S. obligations under international agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement (WTO GPA). It also declares that exceptions to use of domestic products may be made by heads of federal departments or agencies through a waiver process. For more information, please visit our Exceptions and Waivers section.
Section 1605 Interim Final Guidance (PDF*, 140 Kb) defines a 'public building or public work' as "a building or work of a government entity," though in practice, this definition has interpretive elasticity that varies between agencies and departments.
Yes. Buy American legislation has existed since 1933, applies to all U.S. federal procurement and is allowed as an exception under NAFTA Chapter 10 and the WTO GPA, within specific thresholds. Buy America legislation was passed in 1982 and is limited to the Department of Transport, applying to transit-related procurements.
Section 1605 of the ARRA, or the 'Buy American' ARRA provision, is similar in language to the 1933 Buy American Act but differs in a few keys ways:
Under NAFTA, the U.S. requires that Canadian goods and suppliers be exempt from Buy American requirements if procurement is being done directly by a listed U.S. federal department or agency and if the value of procurement exceeds NAFTA thresholds (currently US$25,000 for goods, US$77,494 for general services and US$10,074,262 for construction services). A similar requirement exists under WTO obligations however the threshold level for procurement is US$7,777,000.
Buy American can still apply in many cases because the ARRA bill was drafted so that stimulus money was allocated to the federal agencies and departments, who then grant the money to state and municipal projects. When states and municipalities are the procuring entities, most U.S. international trade obligations do not apply.
There are 37 states2 which are signatories to the WTO GPA and therefore have free trade obligations at the state level to foreign signatories of the WTO GPA. As a recent signatory at the sub-federal level, Canada will have open access to procurement in these 37 states and is therefore exempt from Buy American provisions at the state level.
The Canada-U.S. Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) came into effect in February 2010, in order to overcome procurement barriers that resulted from ARRA. Of particular concern to Canada has been the provision in the legislation that imposes a requirement that "all iron, steel and manufactured goods" used in the construction and repair of "public works and public buildings" funded by the ARRA be produced in the United States. Despite the requirement that the Buy American provisions be applied consistently with the United States' international obligations, Canada remained concerned about the potential negative impact on Canadian suppliers given the lack of international obligations at the sub-federal level between Canada and the United States and the fact much of the ARRA infrastructure spending is by way of transfers from the federal government to state and local governments.
Prior to the Canada-U.S. Agreement on Government Procurement, Canada and the United States only had government procurement commitments to each other at the federal level through NAFTA and WTO GPA. As a result, Canadian suppliers had access to federal-level procurement as per these agreements; however, the absence of procurement commitments at the sub-federal level (state and local level) meant that Canadian suppliers were no longer eligible to compete for procurements funded by the ARRA but carried out by state and local governments. The Canada-U.S. Agreement on Government Procurement provides relief for Canadian suppliers in this area.
The Canada-U.S. GPA has three major components:
The GPA also includes a process for expedited consultation on future concerns related to procurement issues, such as new legislation. The Agreement does not change pre-existing rights of Canadian companies to participate in U.S. federal government procurement, established under the NAFTA and WTO GPA.
The ARRA and its provisions apply to all 50 U.S. states and all municipalities. Canada has received an exemption from the Buy American provisions of the ARRA via two avenues:
The seven programs covered under the Agreement are:
For Canadian firms, it is critical to determine the specific U.S. federal government program that is funding the project on which they are bidding. This is complicated by the fact that projects not funded directly by the U.S. federal government, but through grants/loans to state, regional or local government authorities require searching through multiple information sources. It is important to trace the funding source to ensure that it qualifies. The project owner, prime contractor or distributor should be able to identify whether the project is being funded, at least in part, under the ARRA and through which program. If a Canadian company is being asked to provide a Certificate of Compliance with Buy American requirements, then the project is likely being funded under the ARRA, but it is not necessarily funded under one of the seven programs.
Buy American "Certificate of Compliance" (sometimes referred to as a "certification") is a document that the prime contractor on an ARRA-funded project signs and submits to the granting U.S. agency to demonstrate they are in compliance with section 1605 of the Recovery Act (the Buy American provisions). Often prime contractors require sub-contractors to sign a Certificate of Compliance in order to pass on liability, though contractors should only sign such a Certificate of Compliance when they are certain they comply with the requirements, as signing such a certificate falsely is a serious offence.
The exemption only applies to infrastructure projects where the value of the project as a whole exceeds the WTO GPA threshold (US$7.777 million). If the project value exceeds this threshold, then all purchases going into the project are covered by the exemption. The value of the project as a whole should be the value of the prime contract awarded by the government entity. The project owner, prime contractor or distributor should be able to provide the project value or estimated project value for a contract that has not yet been awarded.
It is important for Canadian companies seeking opportunities in ARRA funded projects to be aware of the limitations created by the ARRA Buy American provisions, but should note the new exemptions to these provisions. In addition, waivers can still be obtained for opportunities that fall outside the seven exempt programs but are still ARRA funded.
Disclaimer: This document has been prepared by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade to provide an overview of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) for Canadian clients. This does not constitute, and should not be used as, legal advice.
 Figures excerpted from Recovery.gov (accessed January 2012).
 Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New York, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
* If you require a plug-in or third-party software to view this file, please visit the alternative formats section of our help page.